Back to Directory
Visit site Full review →
Visit site Full review →
AI Tool Comparison
Cursor vs Windsurf
A side-by-side breakdown to help you pick the right tool for your workflow.
Cursor
Code with an AI that understands your entire codebase — multi-file edits, autonomous agents, and frontier model access on demand. Pro+ and Ultra for teams that live in it.
Coding
freemium
Windsurf
An agentic coding IDE pairing an editor with autonomous coding agents — renamed Devin Desktop after Cognition AI's acquisition, keeping the same editor and Claude/GPT/Gemini model choice.
Coding
freemium
Bottom Line
Cursor edges ahead on rating (4.9 vs 4.7), but the right pick still comes down to which workflow you're running.
Choose Cursor if…
Coding
Choose Windsurf if…
Coding
| Attribute | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing | freemium | freemium |
| Pricing Detail | Free / $20/mo Pro / $60/mo Pro+ / $200/mo Ultra | Free / $20/mo Pro / $40/seat Teams / $200/mo Max |
| Rating |
Key Features
Cursor
- Composer (multi-file editing)
- Codebase-aware chat
- Tab autocomplete
- VS Code compatible
- Agent mode
Windsurf
- Cascade AI agent
- Multi-step task execution
- Full codebase awareness
- Terminal integration
- VS Code based
Pros
Cursor
- •Best-in-class multi-file editing
- •Understands entire repo context
- •Extremely fast completions
- •Active development and updates
Windsurf
- •Excellent autonomous coding agent
- •Tracks what it changed and why
- •Good free tier
- •Handles complex multi-file refactors
Cons
Cursor
- Privacy concerns for sensitive codebases
- Can be expensive for teams
- Occasional context errors on large repos
Windsurf
- Agent can go off-track on complex tasks
- Newer product with occasional instability
- Less plugin ecosystem than VS Code