Back to Directory
Visit site Full review →
Visit site Full review →
AI Tool Comparison
Gemma 3 vs Qwen 3
A side-by-side breakdown to help you pick the right tool for your workflow.
Gemma 3
Superseded by Gemma 4 (April 2026) — Gemini-3-derived reasoning and agentic capability in five open sizes from 2B to 31B, running on phones, laptops, or servers with a 256K context window.
Models
free
Qwen 3
Superseded by Qwen3.5 (Feb 2026) and then Qwen3.6 — Alibaba's current flagship line with strong agentic coding, repository-level reasoning, and multimodal understanding.
Models
freemium
Bottom Line
Gemma 3 and Qwen 3 are rated evenly — the right pick comes down to which workflow you're running.
Choose Gemma 3 if…
Models
Choose Qwen 3 if…
Models
| Attribute | Gemma 3 | Qwen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Models | Models |
| Pricing | free | freemium |
| Pricing Detail | Free and open-weight (Apache 2.0) — now on Gemma 4 | Free and open-weight (Apache 2.0) — now on Qwen3.6 |
| Rating |
Key Features
Gemma 3
- Open weights
- Multilingual and multimodal
- Multiple sizes
- Runs on single GPU
Qwen 3
- Open weights
- Hybrid reasoning modes
- Strong multilingual support
- Many model sizes
Pros
Gemma 3
- •High quality and open
- •Good documentation
- •Flexible sizes
Qwen 3
- •Competitive performance
- •Excellent multilingual ability
- •Open and free
Cons
Gemma 3
- Self-hosting expertise needed
- Behind frontier closed models
Qwen 3
- Docs partly in Chinese
- Hosting expertise required