Back to Directory
Visit site Full review →
Visit site Full review →
AI Tool Comparison
Activepieces vs Workato
A side-by-side breakdown to help you pick the right tool for your workflow.
Activepieces
Build unlimited-run AI workflows and MCP-connected automations without per-task fees, self-hostable under an MIT license for full data control.
Automation
freemium
Workato
Connect apps, orchestrate workflows, and now run AI agents to handle complex, cross-department processes at enterprise scale. Workato One adds agentic orchestration on top of core integration.
Automation
paid
Bottom Line
Workato edges ahead on rating (4.6 vs 4.5), but the right pick still comes down to which workflow you're running.
Choose Activepieces if…
Automation
Choose Workato if…
Automation
| Attribute | Activepieces | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Pricing | freemium | paid |
| Pricing Detail | Free (10 flows) / self-host free / $5/active flow Standard | Custom quote-based — typical SMB ~$110K/yr, Enterprise ~$197K/yr |
| Rating |
Key Features
Activepieces
- Visual flow builder
- AI pieces (OpenAI, Claude)
- Self-hosting
- 100+ apps
- Branching and loops
Workato
- 1,200+ app connectors
- recipe suggestions
- On-prem agent
- Enterprise security and compliance
- Embedded integration platform
Pros
Activepieces
- •Clean modern interface
- •Open source with active development
- •Good AI integration pieces
- •Better pricing than Zapier
Workato
- •Enterprise-grade reliability and compliance
- •Best in class for complex enterprise workflows
- •Strong security controls
- •Excellent support
Cons
Activepieces
- Smaller app library than Zapier
- Community support only for self-hosted
- Enterprise pricing is steep
Workato
- Expensive, not for SMBs
- Requires dedicated admin
- Overkill for simple automations