Back to Directory
Not yet reviewedVisit site Tool details →
Not yet reviewedVisit site Tool details →
AI Tool Comparison
Mastra vs n8n
A side-by-side breakdown to help you pick the right tool for your workflow.
Review Score assesses product quality; Fit Score is specific to a use case. Limited reviews do not establish overall product quality. How reviews work.
Mastra
Build production-ready AI agents and workflows in TypeScript with full type safety. Memory, tool calls, and observability included, no Python detour required.
Developer Tools
free
n8n
Visually connect apps, APIs, and AI models into multi-step automations, free and self-hostable, or run on Cloud with per-execution pricing.
Automation
freemium
Bottom Line
Catalog updated: August 2026
Mastra (Developer Tools) and n8n (Automation) come from different corners of the market, so this usually comes down to which job you're actually hiring a tool for, not a head-to-head on the same task. Mastra runs on a fully free plan while n8n runs on a freemium model, which alone may settle it if budget or a free tier is a hard requirement.
Choose Mastra if…
Best for typeScript teams who want to build agents and RAG pipelines without switching to a Python environment, and its edge is first-class TypeScript primitives for agent memory and branching workflows, built by the team behind Gatsby. The right choice for JS-first teams specifically, Python-first teams should look at LangChain instead. Lean toward n8n instead if free and self-hostable, with the same visual workflow builder as the paid competitors matters more for your use case.
Choose n8n if…
Best for teams that want automation they can self-host and fully control, and its edge is free and self-hostable, with the same visual workflow builder as the paid competitors. The best choice when you want Zapier's flexibility without the recurring cost. Lean toward Mastra instead if first-class TypeScript primitives for agent memory and branching workflows, built by the team behind Gatsby matters more for your use case.
Was this useful?
| Attribute | Mastra | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Automation |
| Pricing | free | freemium |
| Pricing Detail | Open source / Free | Free (self-hosted) / €20/mo Cloud Starter / €50/mo Cloud Pro |
| TWF Review Score | Not yet reviewed | Not yet reviewed |
Key Features
Mastra
- TypeScript-first agent framework with full type inference
- Built-in agent memory with pluggable storage backends
- Workflow engine for multi-step, branching agent pipelines
- Native RAG support with vector store integrations
- Observability layer with traces, spans, and eval hooks
- Built on Vercel AI SDK: works with any LLM provider
n8n
- 400+ integrations
- AI nodes (LangChain)
- Self-hosting option
- Code nodes (JavaScript/Python)
- Complex branching logic
- Natural-language AI Assistant for building workflows
Pros
Mastra
- •TypeScript-native: no Python environment required for JS teams
- •Well-architected OSS from experienced maintainers
- •Fully open source with no forced cloud dependency
n8n
- •Source-available and self-hostable, free for internal business use under its Sustainable Use License
- •More powerful than Zapier for technical users
- •AI nodes are excellent
- •Great value vs Zapier
Cons
Mastra
- Younger ecosystem than LangChain, fewer community examples
- TypeScript-only, not suitable for Python-first teams
- No managed cloud runtime: deployment is self-directed
n8n
- Higher technical bar than Zapier
- Self-hosting requires maintenance
- Debugging complex flows can be hard