theworkflowfinder.com
AI ToolsWorkflowsPromptsStacksCompareBlogPareto 20
Saved tools
Workflow Finder

The Workflow Finder. High-signal tools, real-world workflows, zero noise.

Directory

  • AI Tools
  • Workflows
  • Prompts
  • Compare Tools
  • Tool Stacks

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Submit a Tool

Resources

  • The Pareto 20
  • Review Methodology
  • Fit Score Methodology
  • Search API
  • MCP Server

Account

  • Saved Tools
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 The Workflow Finder. All rights reserved.
Back to Library
Advanced
Agents
Evaluation
Quality Assurance

Evaluate an AI Agent Before Trusting It

Build a repeatable test before you deploy the agent, so a model update, a prompt tweak, or a tool integration change doesn't silently break its judgment without anyone noticing.

Download workflow config (JSON)

How the data moves

This is a handoff plan, not an automatic integration. Review outputs before the next step. Unlabeled arrows show order, not a verified data format. Use the capability links to explore tool substitutions.

  1. Step 1

    Build a Fixture Task Set From Real Cases

    Collect 15-25 representative tasks the agent will actually face, each with a known-correct answer or an acceptable range, drawn from real historical cases rather than invented scenarios. This fixture set is the ground truth everything else in this workflow measures against -- a fixture set built from convenient, easy examples will pass every time and tell you nothing.

    Tools

    No catalog tool specified

  2. Step 2

    Add Adversarial and Edge Cases With Giskard

    Use Giskard's automated test generation to add adversarial inputs to the fixture set: prompt injections, off-topic requests, ambiguous phrasing, and inputs designed to surface hallucinations. A friendly test set only ever tells you the agent works when everything goes right; this is what catches it before a real user does.

    Tools

    • Giskard logo
      Giskard
      • Code review
      • Debugging assistance
  3. Step 3

    Score the Agent Against the Full Set in Braintrust

    Run the fixture set through the agent using Braintrust, scoring each output against defined criteria, correctness, whether it called the right tool, whether the output format is usable downstream, instead of eyeballing a handful of outputs and calling it good.

    Tools

    • Braintrust logo
      Braintrust
      • API integration
  4. Step 4

    Set a Regression Baseline

    Save the current pass rate as the baseline and re-run the full fixture set every time the underlying model updates, the prompt changes, or a connected tool's API changes. Wire this to run automatically rather than relying on remembering to do it by hand -- a manual step is a step that eventually gets skipped right before the change that actually breaks something.

    Tools

    • Braintrust logo
      Braintrust
      • API integration
  5. Step 5

    Log Every Failure With Enough Context to Debug It

    Every failing case gets logged with the input, the agent's actual output, the expected output, and its tool calls if visible, enough for a person to diagnose what went wrong, not just a pass or fail flag with no trail behind it.

    Tools

    No catalog tool specified

Time Required

3-5 hours, one-time setup

Expected Result

A fixture-task test suite with a scored baseline that re-runs automatically whenever the agent's model, prompt, or tools change, flagging any drop in quality before it reaches real users.

Maintenance Reality

Every multi-tool workflow needs upkeep. Here's what this one typically needs.

Typical upkeep
1-2 hrs/month
Single point of failure
The fixture dataset itself -- if it's lost, never updated, or quietly narrowed down to only the easy cases, the whole evaluation stops catching anything real.

What typically breaks

  • • The fixture set goes stale as the agent's real task mix shifts, so a passing score stops meaning what it used to.
  • • A model-provider update changes behavior silently if the regression re-run isn't wired to trigger automatically, so the drop goes unnoticed until a user hits it.

Handover tip: Keep the fixture set and its expected answers in version control next to the agent's config, not in a separate spreadsheet nobody remembers to update, so a successor can see exactly what 'passing' has meant over time.

Was this useful?

Related Workflows

Advanced

Automate Local Dev Tasks Without Paying for an API

Set up a local coding agent that handles repetitive technical work, file cleanup, log parsing, batch renaming, using free open-weight models instead of a metered frontier API, then chain the output into a free automation platform so results land where your team actually looks.

View workflow
Advanced

Build a Custom AI Agent for Your Business Like an Enterprise Copilot Studio Team

Build and deploy your own custom AI agent in about half a day.

View workflow
Advanced

Deploy a Customer-Facing Support Agent Like an Enterprise Contact Center

Get a trained support agent live on your site in about two hours.

View workflow