Back to Directory
Visit site Full review →
Visit site Full review →
AI Tool Comparison
Activepieces vs Make
A side-by-side breakdown to help you pick the right tool for your workflow.
Activepieces
Build unlimited-run AI workflows and MCP-connected automations without per-task fees, self-hostable under an MIT license for full data control.
Automation
freemium
Make
Visually build automation workflows across 3,000+ apps, wiring AI models, webhooks, and business tools together without writing code. Native custom AI provider connections now compete directly with Zapier Agents.
Automation
freemium
Bottom Line
Make edges ahead on rating (4.6 vs 4.5), but the right pick still comes down to which workflow you're running.
Choose Activepieces if…
Automation
Choose Make if…
Automation
| Attribute | Activepieces | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Pricing | freemium | freemium |
| Pricing Detail | Free (10 flows) / self-host free / $5/active flow Standard | Free (1,000 ops) / $10.59/mo Core / $18.82/mo Pro |
| Rating |
Key Features
Activepieces
- Visual flow builder
- AI pieces (OpenAI, Claude)
- Self-hosting
- 100+ apps
- Branching and loops
Make
- Visual workflow builder
- Complex data mapping
- Error handling
- Thousands of apps
- AI module integrations
Pros
Activepieces
- •Clean modern interface
- •Open source with active development
- •Good AI integration pieces
- •Better pricing than Zapier
Make
- •More cost-effective than Zapier
- •Visual interface is great for complex flows
- •Powerful data manipulation
- •Better free tier
Cons
Activepieces
- Smaller app library than Zapier
- Community support only for self-hosted
- Enterprise pricing is steep
Make
- Steeper learning curve
- Interface can be intimidating
- Debugging can be tricky