AI Tool Comparison
Activepieces vs Make
A side-by-side breakdown to help you pick the right tool for your workflow.
Activepieces
Build unlimited-run AI workflows and MCP-connected automations without per-task fees, self-hostable under an MIT license for full data control.
Make
Visually build automation workflows across 3,000+ apps, wiring AI models, webhooks, and business tools together without writing code. Native custom AI provider connections now compete directly with Zapier Agents.
Bottom Line
Last reviewed: August 2026
Activepieces and Make both compete in Automation, overlapping most directly on automation. Make carries the higher rating (4.6 vs 4.5), but a gap that size rarely overrides a real workflow fit on its own.
Choose Activepieces if…
Best for teams that want Zapier-style automation but need to keep sensitive data on their own infrastructure, and its edge is fully self-hostable and open-source, so workflow data never has to touch an external server. A genuine privacy-first alternative to Zapier, the app integration library is still noticeably smaller.
Choose Make if…
Best for technical operations teams who need precise, conditional automation logic that Zapier can't express, and its edge is a visual canvas showing every step and data transformation in a workflow, not a black-box automation. More cost-effective and more powerful than Zapier for complex flows, at the cost of a steeper learning curve.
| Attribute | Activepieces | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Pricing | freemium | freemium |
| Pricing Detail | Free (10 flows) / self-host free / $5/active flow Standard | Free (1,000 credits/mo) / $12/mo Core / $21/mo Pro / $38/mo Teams |
| Rating |
Key Features
Activepieces
- Visual flow builder
- AI pieces (OpenAI, Claude)
- Self-hosting
- 100+ apps
- Branching and loops
Make
- Visual workflow builder
- Complex data mapping
- Error handling
- Thousands of apps
- AI module integrations
- Live Search
- Agent Grid multi-agent orchestration
Pros
Activepieces
- •Clean modern interface
- •Open source with active development
- •Good AI integration pieces
- •Better pricing than Zapier
Make
- •More cost-effective than Zapier
- •Visual interface is great for complex flows
- •Powerful data manipulation
- •Better free tier
Cons
Activepieces
- Smaller app library than Zapier
- Community support only for self-hosted
- Enterprise pricing is steep
Make
- Steeper learning curve
- Interface can be intimidating
- Debugging can be tricky